
Many small business owners carry old, unresolved tax issues — a penalty from a return never filed, an assessment sitting untouched for years, or a compromise application still awaiting action. On July 23, 2026, the Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR) released Revenue Memorandum Circular (RMC) No. 84-2026, setting clear guidelines answering the question many micro entrepreneurs have been asking: how exactly can I settle this? It explains how to apply for the One-Time Abatement Program created under Revenue Regulations (RR) No. 004-2026 — a program that allows qualified Micro Taxpayers to have certain tax liabilities and penalties cancelled.
The program is based on the Commissioner's authority under Section 204(B) of the Tax Code to cancel a tax liability when it would cost more to collect than the amount actually due. It's designed specifically for Micro Taxpayers, a classification created under the Ease of Paying Taxes Act.
Your classification is based on your status in the BIR's system as of December 31, 2025. You can check your status two ways:
To qualify, your total liability per taxable year must not exceed ₱80,000. This total includes:
It does not include interest and surcharge, but if the basic tax underneath them qualifies and gets abated, the interest and surcharge tied to it are cancelled too.
Example: A business owes ₱60,000 in basic tax and ₱15,000 in compromise penalty. That's ₱75,000 — within the threshold — so it qualifies, even though the total bill (with interest and surcharge added) is much higher.
Applications are filed manually at your RDO using BIR Form No. 2121 (three copies). Requirements differ slightly for individuals and businesses, but generally include:
Only complete applications will be accepted.
Important: The CEOTL must be requested from a specific office depending on your case type (for example, the Regional Collection Division for delinquent accounts, or the RDO for open case penalties). It should be issued within two working days of your request.
Every approved application requires a flat fee of ₱5,000, paid through BIR Form No. 0605 using:
Key rules to remember:
The circular also explains how to handle more complicated cases:
Your application can be denied if:
Note: If your application contains material misrepresentation, any abatement already granted can be cancelled, and you may still face civil or criminal liability.
Once your application is approved and the fee is paid, the BIR issues a Certificate of Availment within five working days. This certificate:
Note: This certificate only closes the specific case and year it covers — it is not a general tax clearance, and it does not protect you from future, unrelated assessments.
Once you file your application, the BIR will pause any collection activities (like warrants) for that taxable year while your application is being reviewed. Filing also does not trigger a new audit — the BIR's review is limited to the documents you submit.
If you're a micro business owner with old tax issues, here's a simple next step:
For many small business owners, this program offers a real chance to finally close old cases and move forward with a clean compliance record.
JA
Ready to take your business to the next level? Contact us today to schedule a consultation.

For years, getting audited by the Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR) felt like getting struck by lightning—unpredictable, indiscriminate, and mostly a matter of bad luck.
That perception is fast becoming outdated. The BIR's audit machinery has quietly transformed into a targeted tracking system: fed by bank records, e-commerce platform data, customs filings, and years of assessment history, then pointed squarely at the sectors and behaviors most likely to yield deficiency findings.
For business owners, this shift changes the calculus entirely. The question is no longer "Will I get audited?" but rather "How exposed is my industry, and am I ready if a Letter of Authority shows up tomorrow?"
The BIR's modern audit approach leans on a core set of automated inputs:
Together, these data points form a risk profile. Businesses that score high are considerably more likely to receive an audit notice, regardless of whether they believe their books are clean.
This transition tracks with major institutional reforms. Following a nationwide field audit suspension to review internal controls, the BIR resumed operations under a tighter framework (Revenue Memorandum Order No. 1-2026). The goal is to make audit selection systematic and less dependent on individual examiner discretion, while fiercely cross-checking figures across different tax returns.
Certain industries consistently surface as higher-risk targets because their income and expenses are uniquely scrutinized:
Beyond your specific industry, certain patterns in your filings invite a closer inspection:
The bottom line: Corporate scale no longer offers cover. A small or mid-sized business with a messy filing history will attract more attention than a large corporation with clean, consistent records.
Preparation doesn't have to be complicated, but it demands strict discipline:
With the BIR utilizing data-driven tools like the REVIE chatbot for instant LOA verification and implementing strict single-instance audit limits, audits are faster to initiate and harder to navigate unprepared.
For businesses operating in the Philippines today, the smartest posture isn't anxiety—it's readiness.
SII
Ready to take your business to the next level? Contact us today to schedule a consultation.
.png/:/cr=t:0%25,l:0%25,w:100%25,h:100%25/rs=w:1240,cg:true)
When the Bureau of Internal Revenue rolled out Revenue Regulations (RR) No. 24-2025 last October, it introduced a preferential ½ percent creditable withholding tax (CWT) rate on gross payments made by Top Withholding Agents (TWAs) to manufacturers and direct importers of specific goods. On paper, the rule looked straightforward. In practice, it raised a string of implementation questions — questions the BIR has now moved to settle through 𝐑𝐞𝐯𝐞𝐧𝐮𝐞 𝐌𝐞𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐚𝐧𝐝𝐮𝐦 𝐂𝐢𝐫𝐜𝐮𝐥𝐚𝐫 (𝐑𝐌𝐂) 𝐍𝐨. 𝟎𝟕𝟗-𝟐𝟎𝟐𝟔, issued on July 20, 2026, and signed by Commissioner of Internal Revenue Charlito Martin R. Mendoza.
For bookkeepers, accountants, and compliance officers tasked with getting withholding computations right the first time, this circular is required reading. Here's a breakdown of what changed and why it matters.
The circular opens by confirming a basic but essential fact: RR No. 24-2025 took effect on October 10, 2025 — fifteen days after its publication on the BIR website on September 25, 2025. Any transaction predating that window falls outside the new rate's coverage, which matters for anyone reconciling withholding entries retroactively.
Perhaps the most consequential clarification concerns the phrase "gross payments to manufacturers and direct importers." Many practitioners read this conjunctively, assuming a supplier had to be both a manufacturer and an importer to qualify for the reduced rate. The BIR shuts that interpretation down: the ½% CWT applies if the supplier is 𝐞𝐢𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐫 a manufacturer or a direct importer — not necessarily both. A purely local manufacturer with no import activity still qualifies, as does a straight importer who never manufactures anything, provided the goods sold fall within the categories enumerated in RR No. 24-2025 and are intended for wholesale.
To substantiate a supplier's status, the circular lists acceptable proof: the BIR Certificate of Registration, DTI or SEC registration documents, Mayor's or Business Permit, and BOC Importer Accreditation. TWAs should be prepared to request and file these on onboarding new suppliers, since the burden of correctly classifying a counterparty ultimately rests on the withholding agent.
A recurring point of confusion was whether the ½% rate still applies when a TWA buys goods for its own use, rather than for resale. The circular draws a clean line: 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐜𝐨𝐧𝐭𝐫𝐨𝐥𝐥𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐟𝐚𝐜𝐭𝐨𝐫 𝐢𝐬 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐬𝐞𝐥𝐥𝐞𝐫'𝐬 𝐫𝐞𝐠𝐮𝐥𝐚𝐫 𝐜𝐨𝐮𝐫𝐬𝐞 𝐨𝐟 𝐛𝐮𝐬𝐢𝐧𝐞𝐬𝐬, 𝐧𝐨𝐭 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐛𝐮𝐲𝐞𝐫'𝐬 𝐩𝐮𝐫𝐩𝐨𝐬𝐞.
If the manufacturer or direct importer ordinarily sells at wholesale — to dealers, distributors, or other commercial buyers — the ½% rate applies even if the specific purchaser intends to consume the goods itself. Conversely, if the seller's ordinary business is retail, or the transaction is clearly a retail sale to an end-user, the reduced rate does not apply; the standard 1% CWT rate for suppliers of goods under RR No. 2-98, as amended, takes over instead.
This is a practical relief for TWAs: it means procurement teams don't need to interrogate every purchase's ultimate use case — they simply need to confirm how the seller normally does business.
RR No. 24-2025 explicitly named motor vehicles sold in Completely Built Unit (CBU) or Semi-Knocked Down (SKD) form as covered goods. That specificity prompted a natural question: are vehicles imported or assembled from Completely Knocked Down (CKD) parts excluded?
No, the BIR clarifies. Drawing on the definition in BOC Memorandum Order No. 4-2003, CKD components — sub-parts, sub-assemblies, and full assemblies intended for final assembly — are treated as motor vehicle parts and accessories. Purchases of CKD units from a manufacturer or direct importer therefore remain subject to the ½% CWT, so long as the sale occurs in the ordinary course of business.
The circular also resolves a related ambiguity around the phrase "manufacturing of motor vehicles in CBU or SKD units." The BIR confirms this describes the 𝐨𝐮𝐭𝐩𝐮𝐭 of the manufacturing process (vehicles that end up in CBU or SKD form) rather than the components used as manufacturing inputs.
And motorcycles? They're squarely included. Applying the legal definition of "motor vehicle" under RA No. 4136 (the Land Transportation and Traffic Code) — any vehicle propelled by power other than muscular force, using public highways — motorcycles purchased from manufacturers or direct importers are subject to the same ½% rate.
The circular ties the term "pharmaceutical products" tightly to RA No. 3720, as amended by RA No. 9711 (the FDA Act of 2009). Coverage is limited to medicines, drugs, and pharmaceutical preparations intended for diagnosing, curing, mitigating, treating, or preventing disease — and only those classified and regulated as such by the FDA. Products the FDA does not regulate as drugs or pharmaceutical preparations fall outside the definition entirely, regardless of who manufactures them.
This distinction produced one of the circular's more illustrative examples: a pharmaceutical company that also manufactures and sells milk. Is that milk a "pharmaceutical product"? Generally, no — milk is classified as a food or nutritional product under Department of Health Administrative Order No. 2014-0029, not a drug. It only crosses into pharmaceutical territory if a specific formulation is registered with the FDA as a therapeutic or medicinal preparation — typically specialized or fortified variants prescribed for defined medical conditions. The takeaway for withholding agents: classification follows the product's actual registration, not the identity of the company selling it.
The circular also tightens the definitions around "solid or liquid fuels and related products," anchoring them to Section 148 of the National Internal Revenue Code, RA No. 8479 (the Downstream Oil Industry Deregulation Act), and DOE Circular No. 98-03-004:
This granularity should help TWAs in energy, logistics, and industrial supply chains map their purchase ledgers against the correct withholding tax code with far less guesswork.
Perhaps the most operationally important guidance is tucked toward the end: what happens when a TWA discovers, after the fact, that it applied the ½% rate incorrectly — or failed to apply it when it should have?
The fix must run through the 𝐐𝐮𝐚𝐫𝐭𝐞𝐫𝐥𝐲 𝐑𝐞𝐦𝐢𝐭𝐭𝐚𝐧𝐜𝐞 𝐑𝐞𝐭𝐮𝐫𝐧 𝐨𝐟 𝐂𝐫𝐞𝐝𝐢𝐭𝐚𝐛𝐥𝐞 𝐈𝐧𝐜𝐨𝐦𝐞 𝐓𝐚𝐱𝐞𝐬 𝐖𝐢𝐭𝐡𝐡𝐞𝐥𝐝 (𝐁𝐈𝐑 𝐅𝐨𝐫𝐦 𝐍𝐨. 𝟏𝟔𝟎𝟏𝐄𝐐), filed by the last day of the month following the close of the relevant quarter. Critically, the correction window is bounded by the taxable year: adjustments must be made 𝐰𝐢𝐭𝐡𝐢𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐬𝐚𝐦𝐞 𝐭𝐚𝐱𝐚𝐛𝐥𝐞 𝐲𝐞𝐚𝐫 as the original transaction, in line with RR No. 11-2018, as amended. The circular offers a concrete example — for an error in the fourth quarter of taxable year 2025, the adjustment deadline is January 31, 2026.
This is a hard stop worth flagging internally. Books-of-account reconciliations that surface withholding errors from a prior taxable year cannot simply be corrected on the next available return; they require closer coordination with the BIR on how to properly account for the discrepancy.
RMC No. 079-2026 doesn't rewrite RR No. 24-2025 — it removes the interpretive gray areas that inevitably surface once a regulation meets real-world transactions. For compliance and accounting teams, the practical action items are clear:
With the circular now in effect, TWAs have a much firmer basis for consistent, defensible withholding tax treatment going into the next filing cycles.
This article is based on Revenue Memorandum Circular No. 079-2026, issued by the Bureau of Internal Revenue on July 20, 2026. For binding guidance on specific transactions, consult the full text of the circular or a licensed tax professional.
FDP
We offer a variety of services to help you manage your finances and grow your business. Contact us today to learn more.

For years, getting a Tax Clearance Certificate (TCC) from the Bureau of Internal Revenue meant queuing at a Revenue District Office, submitting stacks of paperwork, and waiting — sometimes for weeks — for a stamped certificate to be released. That process is now being retired in favor of a fully online system, as the BIR has confirmed the nationwide expansion of its Electronic Tax Clearance System (eTCS).
Under Revenue Memorandum Circular (RMC) No. 076-2026, issued on July 9, 2026 and signed by Officer-in-Charge Deputy Commissioner Marissa Q. Cabreros for Commissioner of Internal Revenue Charlito Martin R. Mendoza, the eTCS is now available to taxpayer-applicants registered under nineteen Revenue Regions spanning nearly the entire country — from Ilocos and the Cordilleras in the north, through Central Luzon, Bicol, and the Visayas, down to Zamboanga, Northern Mindanao, Caraga, and Davao in the south.
In effect, this circular completes what earlier issuances began: a shift from a paper-based, walk-in clearance process to a web-based one that taxpayers can access anytime through the BIR's official website.
Tax clearances aren't a bureaucratic afterthought — they're often the gatekeeper document standing between a business and its next opportunity. Companies need a TCC to bid on government contracts. Professionals need one for accreditation. Applicants for bank loans, franchise renewals, and even certain government appointments are routinely asked to prove, on paper, that they have no outstanding tax liabilities.
Historically, securing that proof meant physically visiting an RDO, submitting documents over the counter, and returning later to claim the certificate — a process vulnerable to long queues, incomplete submissions, and unpredictable turnaround times. By migrating this function online, the BIR is addressing a genuine pain point in tax compliance, not just modernizing for its own sake.
The system is built to handle the full lifecycle of a tax clearance application — not just the final printing of a certificate. According to the circular, taxpayer-applicants can use the platform to:
That last point is worth pausing on — the entire transaction, from application to payment to release, now happens without a single face-to-face interaction with BIR personnel.
One detail taxpayers should not overlook is that "tax clearance" isn't a single, one-size-fits-all document. The eTCS processes four distinct certificate types, each tied to a specific use case:
Tax Clearance for Bidding Purposes (TCBP) — required for non-large taxpayers who intend to bid on government contracts for goods or services, as authorized under Executive Order No. 398.
Tax Clearance for General Purposes (TCGP) — a broader certificate confirming tax compliance and no outstanding liability, covering a wide range of scenarios: PNP accreditation for security agencies, promotions or appointments for military and government personnel, professional accreditation, collection matters, LTFRB franchise renewals, bank loan applications, other government agency requirements, and more.
Tax Compliance Verification Certificate (TCVC) — a prerequisite document that most prospective government bidders must first secure from their Revenue District Office's Collection Section before they can even apply for a TCBP. Large taxpayers, along with certain non-resident entities, are exempted from this step.
Delinquency Verification Report (DVR) — another prerequisite, this time feeding into a TCGP application, also obtained from the Collection Section of the taxpayer's RDO.
Understanding which certificate applies to a given transaction — and which prerequisite documents feed into it — will save applicants from delays caused by submitting the wrong request.
RMC No. 076-2026 doesn't exist in isolation. The BIR frames the eTCS as part of its broader Digital Transformation (DX) Roadmap, an ongoing effort to modernize the taxpayer experience across the board — from electronic invoicing requirements to online registration systems. Viewed alongside earlier steps, such as the initial rollout of eTCS to select Metro Manila revenue regions, this circular effectively extends the same convenience to the rest of the country, closing the gap between taxpayers in the capital and those in the provinces.
For an agency historically associated with paperwork and long lines, that's a meaningful signal of intent — even if execution, as with any large-scale government IT rollout, will be the real test.
If your business or professional practice is registered under any of the covered Revenue Regions and you anticipate needing a tax clearance — whether for a government bid, a loan application, or an accreditation renewal — a few practical steps are worth taking now:
RMC No. 076-2026 is a procedural circular on paper, but its practical effect is significant: taxpayers in nineteen Revenue Regions no longer need to set foot in a BIR office to secure a document that can make or break a bid, a loan, or a career milestone. As the eTCS rollout reaches full nationwide coverage, the real measure of its success will be whether it delivers on its promise — faster, more transparent, and more predictable tax clearances for everyone who depends on them.
Disclaimer: This article is for general informational purposes only and should not be taken as professional tax, accounting, or legal advice. Readers are encouraged to consult the official text of RMC No. 076-2026 and seek guidance from qualified tax professionals for compliance matters specific to their circumstances.
NJP
Get in touch with us today to learn more about how we can help your business thrive.

For the millions of sari-sari store owners, freelancers, online sellers, and small service providers who make up the backbone of the Philippine economy, tax compliance has long been a source of quiet dread. A missed filing deadline, an assessment that snowballed with interest and surcharges, or simply the chaos of running a business with no accounting staff — any of these can turn a small tax obligation into a debt that feels impossible to escape.
The Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR) is now offering these taxpayers a way out. Revenue Regulations No. 4-2026, issued under the authority of Sections 244 and 245 of the National Internal Revenue Code, introduces a one-time abatement program specifically designed for "micro taxpayers" — and it's worth understanding exactly how it works, who qualifies, and why the fine print matters.
The regulation borrows its definition from RR No. 8-2024: a micro taxpayer is anyone whose annual gross sales fall below ₱3,000,000. Notably, for individuals earning both a salary and business income, only the business-related earnings count toward this threshold — compensation from employment is excluded entirely. This distinction matters for the growing number of Filipinos who hold day jobs while running side businesses or freelance gigs on the side.
The scope is broader than a typical tax amnesty. It reaches:
Crucially, the program doesn't shut the door on businesses that have already closed. Micro taxpayers who ceased operations can still apply to settle their outstanding accounts, giving former business owners a chance to clear their names without needing to reactivate a business they no longer run.
Perhaps the most taxpayer-friendly feature of this regulation is its simplicity. Rather than requiring a percentage-based settlement — a common feature of past amnesty programs that could still leave small businesses owing substantial sums — RR 4-2026 sets a flat abatement fee of ₱5,000, payable via BIR Form No. 0605.
That said, the process has real teeth. Applicants must:
Miss either five-day window, and the application is automatically voided — though taxpayers can simply refile, provided the overall availment period hasn't lapsed. It's also worth noting that if an application is withdrawn or denied, the ₱5,000 already paid isn't wasted; it gets credited toward the taxpayer's outstanding liability rather than refunded outright.
Taxpayers have until December 31, 2026 to take advantage of this program, unless the Secretary of Finance extends the deadline on the Commissioner's recommendation. Given how administrative processes tend to move, businesses eyeing this option would be wise not to wait until the final weeks of the year.
Upon successful compliance, the relevant Revenue District Office issues a Certificate of Availment within five working days — a document that serves as formal proof that the case is closed and the taxpayer is in the clear. For those with a pending appeal on a disputed assessment, the RDO is also required to notify the BIR's Appellate Division, ensuring the settlement doesn't get lost in a parallel legal process.
On its face, this is a technical regulation. But its real significance lies in what it signals about the BIR's evolving approach to small taxpayer compliance. A flat, low-cost settlement mechanism — rather than a punitive, percentage-based penalty structure — acknowledges a practical reality: many micro businesses fall behind not out of evasion, but out of limited resources, informal recordkeeping, or simple unfamiliarity with filing requirements.
For the self-employed professional who forgot to file a return during a difficult year, or the small retailer sitting on an assessment they've been too intimidated to contest, this regulation offers something rarer than tax relief — a genuine administrative reset. The ₱5,000 fee is modest enough that most eligible taxpayers can absorb it, while the requirement to itemize each case ensures the BIR maintains accurate records rather than issuing blanket forgiveness.
Full details available at: RR No. 4-2026_Redacted.pdf
Disclaimer: This article is for general informational purposes only and should not be taken as professional tax, accounting, or legal advice. Readers are encouraged to consult the official text of RR No. 4-2026 and seek guidance from qualified tax professionals for compliance matters specific to their circumstances.
ACA
Get in touch with us today to learn more about how we can help your business thrive.
.png/:/rs=w:1240,cg:true,m)
The Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR) has issued 𝐑𝐞𝐯𝐞𝐧𝐮𝐞 𝐌𝐞𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐚𝐧𝐝𝐮𝐦 𝐂𝐢𝐫𝐜𝐮𝐥𝐚𝐫 (𝐑𝐌𝐂) 𝐍𝐨. 𝟕𝟐-𝟐𝟎𝟐𝟔, dated 30 June 2026, to clarify the tax treatment of transfers of proprietary club shares held under valid nominee or trust arrangements. The Circular likewise removes the requirement to obtain a prior BIR confirmatory ruling before effecting qualified transfers, subject to compliance with the prescribed conditions and post-audit verification by the BIR.
𝐁𝐚𝐜𝐤𝐠𝐫𝐨𝐮𝐧𝐝
Corporations commonly acquire proprietary club shares to provide their officers and executives with access to club facilities. As many clubs require membership shares to be registered in the name of a natural person, corporations typically designate an officer as a nominee or trustee while retaining the beneficial ownership of the shares.
Previously, when a nominee retired, resigned, or was replaced, corporations generally sought a confirmatory ruling from the BIR to establish that the transfer of legal title to a new nominee was not subject to applicable transfer taxes. RMC No. 72-2026 addresses this long-standing administrative requirement by providing a uniform tax treatment for qualified nominee transfers.
𝐇𝐢𝐠𝐡𝐥𝐢𝐠𝐡𝐭𝐬 𝐨𝐟 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐂𝐢𝐫𝐜𝐮𝐥𝐚𝐫
𝐂𝐨𝐧𝐝𝐢𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐬 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐓𝐚𝐱 𝐓𝐫𝐞𝐚𝐭𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭
The tax treatment outlined in the Circular applies only where the following conditions are satisfied:
Failure to satisfy these conditions or any material misrepresentation may result in the assessment of the applicable taxes, including penalties and surcharges, based on the true nature of the transaction.
𝐏𝐫𝐚𝐜𝐭𝐢𝐜𝐚𝐥 𝐈𝐦𝐩𝐥𝐢𝐜𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐬
The Circular significantly reduces the administrative burden associated with the replacement of nominees or trustees holding proprietary club shares. By removing the prior ruling requirement, the Circular streamlines the transfer process for qualified corporations and reduces administrative delays associated with replacing nominee or trustee shareholders.
Nevertheless, the relaxation of the ruling requirement should not be viewed as a relaxation of compliance. The BIR retains the authority to conduct post-audit verification, and transactions that fail to satisfy the prescribed conditions or are found to involve misrepresentation may be subjected to the applicable taxes, penalties, and surcharges. Accordingly, corporations should ensure that trust arrangements are properly documented and that proprietary club shares are consistently recognized as corporate assets in their accounting records.
𝐎𝐮𝐫 𝐈𝐧𝐬𝐢𝐠𝐡𝐭𝐬
RMC No. 72-2026 reflects the BIR's continued efforts to streamline tax administration while maintaining appropriate safeguards against potential abuse. Although the Circular removes the need for a prior confirmatory ruling, taxpayers should not view this as a relaxation of compliance requirements.
Corporations should ensure that nominee or trust arrangements are supported by complete documentation and that proprietary club shares are consistently recognized as corporate assets to substantiate their beneficial ownership during a BIR post-audit.
Disclaimer: This article is for general informational purposes only and should not be taken as professional tax, accounting, or legal advice. Readers are encouraged to consult the official text of RMC No. 72-2026 and seek guidance from qualified tax professionals for compliance matters specific to their circumstances.
KSS
We offer a variety of services to help you manage your finances and grow your business. Contact us today to learn more.

The BIR just released RR No. 29-2025, increasing the tax-exempt ceilings for "De Minimis" benefits. This means more take-home pay for employees as items like rice subsidies (now ₱2.5k/month), clothing allowances (now ₱8k/year), and Christmas gifts (now ₱6k/year) are now shielded from income tax at higher amounts!
Effectivity: These changes take effect 15 days after publication (around early January 2026). Check with your HR or Payroll teams to see how this impacts your 2026 compensation structure!

Employers should review their existing benefits policies immediately. Since these benefits are not subject to withholding tax (and not subject to Fringe Benefit Tax for managers), they represent a highly cost-effective way to improve employee morale and retention in a competitive market.

Revenue Memorandum Circular (RMC) No. 109-2025 was issued to provide crucial clarification on the exact coverage of the audit suspension mandated by RMC No.
107-2025. This circular distinguishes between the activities that must pause and the critical functions that must continue.
Activities That Remain SUSPENDED (The Audit Pause):
The general suspension applies to fieldwork and activities involving direct contact with taxpayers concerning general tax audits:
Activities That Are NOT Suspended (The Critical Exceptions):
RMC No. 109-2025 explicitly outlines the critical exceptions where examinations and processes must continue:
RMC No. 109-2025 ensures that the BIR's necessary "Audit Reset" for reform does not compromise time-sensitive government functions. It provides a strategic balance, protecting taxpayer rights while securing the collection of critical and expiring tax revenues.
Reference: RMC No. 109-2025, Clarification on the Coverage of Audit Suspension Under RMC No. 107-2025 RMC No. 109-2025.pdf
Disclaimer: This article is for general informational purposes only and should not be taken as professional tax, accounting, or legal advice. Readers are encouraged to consult the official text of RMC No. 109-2025 and seek guidance from qualified tax professionals for compliance matters specific to their circumstances.
We offer a wide range of accounting services, including tax preparation, bookkeeping, audit, and financial planning. Our team has the expertise and experience to help you navigate the complex world of accounting and finance, and we are committed to providing personalized service that meets your unique needs.

As part of the Philippines’ continuing commitment to financial integrity and international compliance, the Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR) issued Revenue Memorandum Circular No. 86-2025 to formally support the implementation of the National Anti-Money Laundering, Counter-Terrorism Financing, and Counter-Proliferation Financing Strategy (2023–2027). This circular affirms the BIR’s institutional role in the country’s whole-of-government approach to combating financial crimes and reinforces its alignment with the standards set by the Financial Action Task Force (FATF). It also mandates active participation in the Money Laundering/Terrorism Financing National Risk Assessment (NRA), ensuring that tax enforcement contributes meaningfully to national security and regulatory cohere
RMC No. 86-2025 enjoins all BIR offices and personnel to support the implementation of the national AML/CFT/CPF strategy and participate in the NRA. The directive emphasizes the importance of inter-agency coordination, data sharing, and risk-based profiling to strengthen the country’s defenses against illicit financial flows.
The circular reflects the Philippines’ commitment to the FATF framework and positions the BIR as a key contributor to AML/CFT/CPF efforts. It calls for the integration of financial intelligence into tax administration and promotes proactive supervision across sectors vulnerable to money laundering, terrorism financing, and proliferation financing.
BIR offices are directed to:
These responsibilities signal a shift toward integrated compliance and cross-sector vigilance.
Although the circular is addressed to internal BIR personnel, it carries indirect implications for regulated entities and taxpayers. These may include:
Entities engaged in cross-border trade, digital commerce, or high-risk sectors should ensure documentation is complete, traceable, and defensible.
For professionals in governance, audit, and risk management, RMC No. 86-2025 signals a broader regulatory posture:
This issuance reinforces the need for integrated risk management frameworks across both public and private institutions.
RMC No. 86-2025 positions the BIR as a strategic partner in the Philippines’ national effort to combat financial crimes. It strengthens inter-agency collaboration, enhances
risk-based enforcement, and aligns tax administration with global AML/CFT/CPF standards. The circular underscores the importance of proactive compliance and institutional readiness for evolving regulatory expectations.
Access the full issuance via the BIR official website or consult your compliance advisor for implementation guidance or read the full disclosure here: RMC No. 86.pdf
Get in touch with us today to learn more about how we can help your business thrive.
RR No. 15-2025, Revised Private Retirement Benefit Plan
Key features of Revenue Regulations (RR) No. 15-2025, which revises the policies and guidelines for private retirement benefit plans in the Philippines
Scope and Coverage
Tax Incentives and Privileges
Qualification Requirements
To qualify for tax incentives:
Compliance and Documentation
Coverage Rules
Anti-Abuse Safeguards
Administrative Fees
Disclaimer: The below document is shared for informational purposes only. All rights and authority remain with the Bureau of Internal Revenue.

The Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR) issued Revenue Memorandum Circular No. 005-2026 on January 12, 2026, formalizing the use of Chatbot REVIE as an official platform for verifying the authenticity of Letters of Authority (LOAs).
Purpose of the Circular
The issuance aims to:
LOA Verification Process
Under the circular, taxpayers may:
If the LOA is validated, the system will confirm that the LOA exists. If not found, the taxpayer is advised to coordinate with the BIR for further verification.
Practical Implications for Taxpayers
Taxpayers are encouraged to verify LOAs before accommodating any audit or examination, ensuring that only duly authorized BIR personnel conduct official transactions. This system strengthens taxpayer protection and promotes accountability within the tax administration process.
Reference: https://bir-cdn.bir.gov.ph/BIR/pdf/RMC%20No.%205-2026.pdf
Disclaimer: This article is for general informational purposes only and should not be taken as professional tax, accounting, or legal advice. Readers are encouraged to consult the official text of Revenue Memorandum Circular No. 005-2026 and seek guidance from qualified tax professionals for compliance matters specific to their circumstances.
ABD/MP
We offer a variety of services to help you manage your finances and grow your business. Contact us today to learn more.
We use cookies to analyze website traffic and optimize your website experience. By accepting our use of cookies, your data will be aggregated with all other user data.