Escano CPAs
Escano CPAs
  • Home
  • Leadership
  • Our Services
  • Careers
  • Contact Us
  • Event Highlights
  • Relevant SEC Updates
  • Relevant BIR Updates
  • MSME Hub
  • Insights and Advisory
  • More
    • Home
    • Leadership
    • Our Services
    • Careers
    • Contact Us
    • Event Highlights
    • Relevant SEC Updates
    • Relevant BIR Updates
    • MSME Hub
    • Insights and Advisory
  • Home
  • Leadership
  • Our Services
  • Careers
  • Contact Us
  • Event Highlights
  • Relevant SEC Updates
  • Relevant BIR Updates
  • MSME Hub
  • Insights and Advisory

Stay Ahead. Your Source for Strategic SEC Briefings.

Stay informed with timely, actionable updates from the Philippine Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)—curated to support informed decisions, regulatory confidence, and purposeful enterprise growth.


Compliance made clearer. Decisions made wiser.

Find out more

𝐏𝐇𝐈𝐋𝐈𝐏𝐏𝐈𝐍𝐄 𝐆𝐑𝐄𝐄𝐍 𝐄𝐐𝐔𝐈𝐓𝐘

𝐒𝐄𝐂 𝐈𝐒𝐒𝐔𝐄𝐒 𝐆𝐔𝐈𝐃𝐄𝐋𝐈𝐍𝐄𝐒 𝐎𝐍 𝐏𝐇𝐈𝐋𝐈𝐏𝐏𝐈𝐍𝐄 𝐆𝐑𝐄𝐄𝐍 𝐄𝐐𝐔𝐈𝐓𝐘

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has taken a step toward sustainable finance with the release of Memorandum Circular No. 13, Series of 2025, which introduces the Guidelines on Philippine Green Equity offerings. The circular aims to make companies that engage in green activities more visible and attractive to investors while ensuring that such activities are credible, transparent, and measurable.


Through this initiative, the SEC strengthens its active role in promoting the use of capital markets to help achieve the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals and meet targets under the Paris Agreement, particularly in reducing greenhouse gas emissions.


Applicability and Coverage


The Philippine Green Equity Guidelines primarily govern the designation of the Green Equity label in the Philippine stock market. The Guidelines intends to provide a coherent framework for issuers that voluntarily choose to align their equity offerings or listings with environmentally sustainable finance objectives.


While the framework encourages more companies to integrate sustainability into their financial strategies, it does not modify, supplement, or otherwise affect the existing mandatory listing requirements of the Philippine Stock Exchange (PSE)’s existing mandatory listing requirements. Instead, it works alongside them, allowing both newly listed and existing companies to apply for the Green Equity label provided they meet the eligibility criteria and compliance requirements specified in the Guidelines.


Objectives


The Guidelines aims to:


  • Enhance the visibility and attractiveness of companies that actively engage in green activities.
  • Complement existing sustainable finance instruments including thematic bonds by establishing a parallel equity-based framework to provide investors with additional mechanisms to support environmentally sustainable enterprises. 
  • Accelerate the use and integration of the SFTG* and the ATSF** into business practices. 


*SFTG refers to the document published by the FSF (SEC, BSP, IC & PDIC), which provides guidance on the classification of economic activities as being environmentally and socially sustainable.

**ATSF refers to the multi-tiered framework designed to be an inclusive and credible classification system for sustainable activities in ASEAN.


Criteria for the Green Equity Label


To qualify, companies must satisfy all four criteria below:


  1. At minimum, more than 50% of the revenue of the company as reported in the latest audited annual financial statements, must be derived from Green Activities. 
  2. At minimum, more than 50% of the investments (sum of capital expenditure and operating expenditure) of the company as reported in the latest audited annual financial statements, must be channelled towards Green Activities. 
  3. Revenues of the company derived from fossil fuel must be limited to less than 5%. 
  4. The company's activities must meet the eligibility criteria of the SFTG or ATSF. 


Failure to meet any one of these criteria shall disqualify a company from obtaining or maintaining the Green Equity Label. 


External Review


To ensure credibility and transparency, an external reviewer must evaluate the company’s alignment with the criteria for the Green Equity Label, applying their published proprietary methodology for the assessment and detailing all required information in an assessment report.


External reviewers must possess demonstrated expertise and a strong, credible track record in conducting assessments relevant to green equity designation, sustainable finance, and Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) practices. They are also required to disclose their relevant credentials and expertise, methodology, and scope of the review conducted in the assessment report. Furthermore, the assessment reports which confirms the company’s alignment with the Green Equity Label criteria, must also be publicly available through a website designated by the company.


Disclosure and Periodic Assessment


To uphold transparency, companies with Philippine Green Equity Label are required to submit an annual assessment report to the PSE, after one (1) year from the initial grant of the label, and annually thereafter. The report must be made available and accessible on a publicly available website.


The report should contain:


  1. The share of revenue derived from Green Activities;
  2. The share of investments of the company that are channeled into Green Activities;
  3. The activities from which the company derives its revenue and details of alignment with either the SFTG or ATSF;
  4. The investments of the company and details of alignment with either the SFTG or ATSF; and
  5. The revenues of the company derived from fossil fuel limited to less than 5%.


The assessment report shall be externally reviewed in line with the expertise and experience of the external reviewer, and must also be made publicly available. The disclosures made should be able to support the company's assertion that it has met the requirements of the Guidelines and must include details of the criteria used, methodology applied and outcomes.


Amendments


Any amendment to the information on activities in which the company is engaged or invested in and other relevant material information pertaining to the Philippine Green Equity Label shall first be disclosed to the SEC and the PSE prior its release to the news media or public. 


  • For material information, under the Securities Regulation Code (SRC) and its Implementing Rules and Regulations, or the disclosure rules of the PSE, the issuer shall comply with the applicable disclosure and filing requirements.
  • For non-material information, pertaining solely to the Philippine Green Equity Label and not forming part of a registration statement or prospectus, the disclosure must be submitted to the Commission and the PSE no later than seven (7) days after the discovery that the information is no longer accurate.


If there are structural or other material changes in the company that may impact the company's ability to meet the criteria set in the Guidelines, a confirmation from an external reviewer verifying the company's continued alignment with the Guidelines is required.


Monitoring and Oversight


The PSE is the primary monitoring body to ensure that companies maintaining the Philippine Green Equity Label continue to comply with the requirements of the Guidelines. 

The PSE shall submit to the SEC, within one hundred five (105) days after the end of the fiscal year, a consolidated report summarizing:


  1. The compliance status of all issuers with Philippine Green Equity Label;
  2. Instances of delayed, inconsistent, and incomplete disclosures;
  3. Any observed trends or systemic issues in relation to adhering to the criteria specified in the Guidelines.


Where the PSE identifies non-compliance, misrepresentation, or other violations of the Guidelines, it shall immediately notify the SEC.  The cancellation, suspension or withdrawal of a company's Green Equity label, as well as the imposition of administrative penalties for violations of the Guidelines shall be determined by the SEC pursuant to the Guidelines or other actions deemed appropriate by the SEC.


Withdrawal, Suspension, or Cancellation of the use of the Philippine Green Equity Label:

The SEC reserves the right to cancel any use of the Philippine Green Equity Label after due notice and hearing. The use of the green equity label shall be subject at all times to the continued compliance with the established criteria, disclosure obligations and other requirements.


A company whose label has been withdrawn, suspended, or cancelled may reapply for Green Equity designation upon the completion of necessary requirements and submission of confirmation by an external reviewer that the company fully complies with the applicable standards and requirements set in the Guidelines.


Except for a company whose label has been cancelled or suspended for the reason(s) stipulated in the Guidelines, in which case the company may reapply only after two (2) years from the date of cancellation or suspension of the Green Equity designation.


For the full memorandum circular, read here:  SEC MC No. 13, series of 2025SEC GUIDELINES ON PHILIPPINE GREEN EQUITY - Securities and Exchange Commission 


Disclaimer: The above document is shared for informational purposes only. All rights and authority remain with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Our Services

We offer a variety of services to help you manage your finances and grow your business. Contact us today to learn more.

Learn More
Image by Michael Pointner from Pixabay

SEC Sets Nine-Year Cap on Board Tenure

Independent, But Not Indefinite: SEC Sets Nine-Year Cap on Board Tenure (JJR)

On 30 September 2025, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) of the Philippines released a draft Memorandum Circular proposing new rules on the duration and term limits of Independent Directors (IDs). This initiative reflects the Commission’s commitment to enhancing board independence, aligning with international best practices, and reinforcing the principles of accountability and transparency under Republic Act No. 11232, the Revised Corporation Code of the Philippines (RCCP).


The proposed circular is open for public comment until 15 October 2025 and is expected to take effect on 01 January 2026, following publication in two national newspapers. Covered entities include publicly-listed companies, public companies, and registered issuers.


Key Governance Reforms


Fixed Three-Year Term Independent Directors shall be elected for a fixed term of three years. This replaces flexible tenure arrangements and introduces a standardized term structure across boards.


Staggered Term Expiration To ensure continuity and avoid simultaneous board turnover, companies must adopt staggered initial terms (e.g., 1-year, 2-year, and 3-year assignments). This approach supports institutional memory while enabling periodic board refreshment.


Nine-Year Term Limit IDs may serve a cumulative maximum of nine years, reckoned from 2012. Any fraction of a year served counts as one full year. Companies must disclose nominees who will breach the term limit during their upcoming tenure in SEC Form 20-IS.


Disqualification and Reclassification IDs who reach the nine-year limit are disqualified from continuing as independent directors in the same company but may be eligible for election as non-independent directors. IDs who lose their qualifications mid-term must immediately vacate the position.


Penalties for Non-Compliance Violations of the circular’s mandatory provisions carry penalties of ₱1,000,000, with an additional ₱100,000 monthly fine for continued breaches.


Transitory Provision Incumbent IDs who have already served the maximum term may remain in office until the company’s Annual Stockholders’ Meeting in 2026.


This reform signals a shift toward disciplined board governance. By enforcing fixed terms and staggered expiration, the SEC aims to preserve independence while ensuring orderly succession. The nine-year cap mitigates risks of entrenchment and reinforces objectivity in board oversight.


Governance committees, corporate secretaries, and compliance officers must immediately review board composition, term histories, and succession plans. Disclosure protocols should be updated to reflect term breaches, and nomination processes must anticipate reclassification of long-serving IDs.


The SEC’s proposed framework for Independent Director tenure represents a maturing governance landscape in the Philippines. It balances continuity with accountability and aligns local practices with global standards. As the January 2026 effectivity date approaches, covered companies are urged to prepare for implementation and actively participate in the comment process to ensure practical and effective adoption.


Reference; Access the draft memorandum circular here:  REQUEST FOR COMMENTS ON THE EXPOSURE OF THE DRAFT MEMORANDUM CIRCULAR ON THE DURATION OF TERM AND TERM LIMIT OF INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS - Securities and Exchange Commission 

Our Services

We offer a variety of services to help you manage your finances and grow your business. Contact us today to learn more.

Learn More

SEC EXPANDS INDUSTRIES ELIGIBLE FOR ONE-DAY REGISTRAtion

According to Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Press Release No. 2025-110 (issued 27 August 2025), the Commission has significantly expanded the list of industries eligible for its One Day Submission and Electronic Registration of Companies (OneSEC) Zuper Easy Registration Online facility. 


From the previous 33 industries, the list has now grown to 81, enabling more businesses to complete their company registration within a day. The expanded coverage has resulted in a significant increase in the number of companies registered through OneSEC. In July 2025, the SEC recorded 2,938 registrations, compared to only 1,014 registrations in May, representing a growth of nearly 300%.


Launched in 2021, OneSEC is a subsystem of the Electronic Simplified Processing of Application for Registration of Company (eSPARC), which makes use of pre-filled application forms to streamline the registration process. With the system, companies can complete the registration in as fast as 1 minute and 14 seconds, from the start of the application to the receipt of a digital certificate of incorporation.


Corporations eligible under the “pass through” system include one-person corporations and regular corporations with 2 to 15 incorporators, board of directors, and stockholders.


The SEC also highlighted several incentives and reforms to improve ease of doing business, and to encourage more micro, small, and medium enterprises to register as corporations, the SEC granted:


  • A 20% discount in registration fees for micro, small, and medium enterprises (MSMEs), and
  • Up to 50% discount in the filing fee for those seeking to tap the capital market, under Memorandum Circular (MC) No. 8, Series of 2025.
  • MC No. 6, Series of 2025, which reduced rates for corporate data requests by half.
    MC No. 7, Series of 2025, which imposed strict timelines in the processing of applications for permits, licenses, registrations, certificates, clearances, and other authorizations. This circular also included the adoption of a “deemed approved” policy should the Commission fail to meet its own deadline for review.


For the complete list of the 81 industries now qualified for OneSEC registration and full details of the new policies, please refer to the official SEC Press Release No. 2025-110. 


Disclaimer: The below document is shared for informational purposes only. All rights and authority remain with the Securities and Exchange Commission.


Source:  SEC EXPANDS INDUSTRIES ELIGIBLE FOR ONE-DAY COMPANY REGISTRATION - Securities and Exchange Commission 


HJA

Our Services

We offer a wide range of accounting services, including tax preparation, bookkeeping, payroll processing, and financial planning. Our team has the expertise and experience to help you navigate the complex world of accounting and finance, and we are committed to providing personalized service that meets your unique needs.

Learn More

allowable activities of a representative office

Navigating Boundaries: Key Features of SEC Opinion No. 25-09 on Representative Offices

In the dynamic landscape of foreign investment, the Philippine Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) plays a pivotal role in defining the operational boundaries of foreign entities. One such landmark clarification is SEC Opinion No. 25-09, which outlines the allowable activities of a representative office—a structure often favored by foreign corporations seeking a foothold in the country without engaging in income-generating operations.


What Is a Representative Office?


A representative office is a business presence established by a foreign corporation in the Philippines, strictly for liaison purposes. It is not allowed to derive income from Philippine sources and is funded entirely by its head office abroad. This structure is ideal for companies that aim to explore the market, coordinate with local partners, or manage regional operations without engaging in commercial transactions.


Key Highlights of SEC Opinion No. 25-09


SEC Opinion No. 25-09 provides critical guidance on what a representative office can—and cannot—do. Here are the core features:


1. Non-Income Generating Activities

  • The representative office must not engage in revenue-generating activities.
  • It cannot sell goods or services, issue invoices, or enter into contracts that result in income from Philippine sources.


2. Permissible Functions

  • Promotional activities for the parent company’s products or services.
  • Market research and feasibility studies.
  • Coordination and communication with local clients or suppliers.
  • Quality control and inspection of goods sourced from the Philippines.
  • Reporting to the head office on local developments.


These activities are considered ancillary and supportive, not commercial in nature.


3. Funding and Expenses

  • All operational expenses must be remitted from the head office.
  • The representative office must not receive payments from Philippine entities, even as reimbursement.


4. Legal and Regulatory Boundaries

  • The representative office is not a separate legal entity; it acts solely on behalf of the foreign corporation.
  • It must register with the SEC and comply with reporting obligations, including the submission of audited financial statements and General Information Sheets.


Why This Matters


SEC Opinion No. 25-09 serves as a regulatory compass for foreign corporations navigating Philippine business laws. It protects the integrity of the local tax base by ensuring that only duly registered entities engage in commercial activities. At the same time, it provides a low-risk entry point for foreign firms to build relationships, understand the market, and lay the groundwork for future expansion.


Insightful Ending: Strategy Within Structure


For visionary leaders and compliance-driven firms, understanding the nuances of SEC Opinion No. 25-09 is more than a legal exercise—it’s a strategic imperative. The representative office model offers a disciplined pathway to engagement, allowing foreign corporations to build trust, gather intelligence, and prepare for full-scale operations without breaching regulatory thresholds.


In a region where governance and growth must go hand in hand, clarity is power. And in the Philippines, that clarity begins with knowing where liaison ends—and commerce begins.


Disclaimer: The below document is shared for informational purposes only. All rights and authority remain with the Securities and Exchange Commission.


Opinion No. 25-09 Re: Allowable Activities of a Representative Office

Photo by rotekirsche20 via Pixabay

Photo by rotekirsche20 via Pixabay

Participation of Foreigners in the Board of Directors

SEC Opinion No. 25-10: Defining the Boundaries of Foreign Participation in Philippine Boards

In an era where cross-border collaboration fuels innovation and growth, the Philippine Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Opinion No. 25-10 stands as a crucial interpretive guide for corporations navigating the delicate balance between foreign investment and national interest. This opinion addresses a recurring question in corporate governance: Can foreign nationals serve as directors in Philippine corporations?


The answer is nuanced—and strategically important.


No Absolute Ban, But Clear Boundaries


The Revised Corporation Code does not impose a blanket prohibition on foreigners serving as directors. However, their eligibility is not unconditional. It is subject to constitutional provisions, the Anti-Dummy Law, and industry-specific regulations that safeguard Filipino control in key sectors.


Proportional Representation Based on Equity


Foreign nationals may be elected to the board only in proportion to their allowable equity share. If a corporation is subject to a 40% foreign ownership cap, then only 40% of its board may be composed of foreign directors. This principle ensures that governance power mirrors ownership rights.


Sector-Specific Restrictions


Certain industries—such as mass media, public utilities, and land ownership—are constitutionally reserved for Filipinos. Even indirect control through board representation is restricted, reinforcing the country’s commitment to economic sovereignty.


Anti-Dummy Law Enforcement


The SEC reiterates that nominee arrangements or proxy schemes designed to circumvent nationality restrictions are prohibited. Genuine control must reflect actual ownership and legal entitlement.


Documentation Integrity


Corporations must ensure that board composition is accurately reflected in equity records and official filings, such as the General Information Sheet. Transparency and consistency are non-negotiable.


Insightful Ending: Governance as a Mirror of Integrity


SEC Opinion No. 25-10 is more than a legal clarification—it’s a governance compass. It reminds us that board composition is not just a matter of corporate strategy but a reflection of national values. For firms seeking to integrate foreign expertise, the challenge lies not in exclusion, but in structuring participation within the bounds of law and principle.


In the Philippine context, governance is not merely about who leads—it’s about how leadership honors both opportunity and accountability. And in that balance, true resilience is found. 


Disclaimer: The below document is shared for informational purposes only. All rights and authority remain with the Securities and Exchange Commission.


Opinion No. 25-10 Re: Participation of Foreigners in the Board of Directors 


Photo by PIRO4D via Pixabay

Photo by PIRO4D via Pixabay

The Effect of Merger

Understanding SEC Opinion No. 25-11

In the dynamic landscape of corporate restructuring, SEC Opinion No. 25-11 offers critical guidance on the legal and operational implications of a merger under Philippine law. This opinion clarifies how mergers take effect and what obligations arise for the entities involved.


Key Features of the Opinion


Effectivity Date of Merger

The merger becomes effective upon issuance of the Certificate of Merger by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). This certificate serves as the formal recognition of the merger’s legal consummation.


Stipulated Effective Date

While the Revised Corporation Code prescribes the SEC’s certificate as the trigger for effectivity, the parties may stipulate a different effective date in their merger agreement. This is allowed provided no party is prejudiced and public policy considerations are observed.


Binding Nature of Agreement

Once approved by the SEC, the stipulated date becomes binding on the parties, even if the certificate is issued on a later date. This flexibility allows businesses to align legal effectivity with operational timelines.


Tax and Compliance Implications

The absorbed corporation must file a short-period income tax return covering the period from the start of the taxable year up to the effective date of the merger. This ensures proper closure of its tax obligations.


Why It Matters


For business owners, accountants, and legal professionals, Opinion No. 25-11 underscores the importance of precise documentation and strategic planning in merger transactions. It empowers parties to manage timing with clarity while remaining compliant with SEC and BIR requirements.


Disclaimer: The below document is shared for informational purposes only. All rights and authority remain with the Securities and Exchange Commission.


Opinion No. 25-11 Re: Effect of Merger



 Photo by trungkhang via Pixabay 

SEC Opinion No. 25-12: Incorporated Joint Ventures

Incorporated Joint Ventures at a Glance

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) clarified in Opinion No. 25-12 that an incorporated joint venture (IJV)—formed as a corporation—is governed by the Corporation Code, not by partnership rules under the Civil Code.


Key Highlights:


  • Separate Legal Entity: An IJV registered with the SEC is a distinct juridical person, with rights and obligations independent of its incorporators.
  • Not a Partnership: Despite the term "joint venture," once incorporated, the entity is treated as a corporation—not a partnership.
  • Corporate Governance: IJVs must comply with corporate formalities, including board structure, voting rights, and reporting obligations.
  • Foreign Equity Rules Apply: If foreign investors are involved, the IJV must observe nationality restrictions under the Foreign Investments Act and Anti-Dummy Law.


Implication for Businesses:


Forming an IJV as a corporation offers legal clarity, limited liability, and structured governance—ideal for long-term strategic collaborations.


Disclaimer: The below document is shared for informational purposes only. All rights and authority remain with the Securities and Exchange Commission. 

Download PDF

Accelerating Business Approvals with Certainty & Discipline

SEC MC 7, s. 2025: Accelerating Business Approvals

In a landmark move to reinforce its role as both regulator and facilitator, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has issued Memorandum Circular No. 07, Series of 2025, establishing strict timelines for processing applications and introducing a “deemed approved” mechanism for unattended requests. This reform aligns with the Ease of Doing Business and Efficient Government Service Delivery Act of 2018 (RA No. 11032) and signals a new era of responsiveness and predictability in regulatory action.


Key Features of the Circular

  • Time-Bound Processing Commitments
    • Simple applications: Must be resolved within 3 working days
    • Complex applications: Must be completed within 7 working days
    • Highly technical applications: Must be processed within 20 working days
    • Applications governed by special laws: Follow timelines under applicable statutes or the SEC Citizen’s Charter
  • “Deemed Approved” Rule
    • If the SEC fails to act within the prescribed period without issuing a deficiency notice, the application is automatically approved, provided all required documents are complete
    • A Payment Assessment Form (PAF) must be issued immediately, and documents released within 2 working days of payment
  • Post-Approval Safeguards
    • Approvals are subject to post-evaluation
    • Submissions found to contain false or misleading information may be revoked and penalized
    • Applicants remain liable for damages caused by non-compliance or misrepresentation
  • Exclusions
    • The deemed approved rule does not apply to: 
      • Applications under legal investigation
      • Cases involving fraud or misrepresentation
      • Delays due to force majeure
      • Multi-agency evaluations where delays are outside SEC’s control
  • Coverage of Pending Applications
    • Applications with valid PAFs as of July 14, 2025 are covered
    • Reverted applications must be corrected within 10 working days, or they will be deemed abandoned  

Strategic Impact


This policy is more than procedural—it’s a cultural shift. By enforcing discipline in internal processes and eliminating bottlenecks, the SEC is:

  • Enhancing investor confidence
  • Reducing regulatory uncertainty
  • Supporting faster business formation and expansion

As SEC Chairman Francis Lim aptly stated, “We are removing bottlenecks, eliminating unreasonable delays, and imposing discipline to give entrepreneurs and investors the level of responsiveness they deserve.”


Disclaimer: The below document is shared for informational purposes only. All rights and authority remain with the Securities and Exchange Commission. 

Download PDF

Mandatory Use of the Zuper Easy Registration Online

SEC MC No. 03-2025: Mandatory Use of ZERO in Registration

Effective April 7, 2025, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) requires all domestic stock corporations to register through the Zuper Easy Registration Online (ZERO) system, using either the eSPARC or OneSEC portals.


Key Features of SEC ZERO:


  • Fully Digital & Paperless: Eliminates physical signatures, notarization, and hardcopy submissions.
  • eSECURE Integration: Applicants must create a credentialed account to verify identity via live photo and contact details.
  • eSAP Authentication: Documents (e.g., Articles of Incorporation, By-laws) are digitally signed using one-time passwords (OTPs).
  • Real-Time Processing: Registration can be completed anytime, anywhere, with system-generated certificates holding full legal validity.
  • Coverage: Applies to domestic stock corporations, One Person Corporations, and entities with 2 to 15 incorporators. Lending, financing, and foreign corporations are temporarily exempt.


This initiative aligns with the Ease of Doing Business Act and the Electronic Commerce Act, streamlining corporate registration and enhancing transparency. 


Disclaimer: The below document is shared for informational purposes only. All rights and authority remain with the Securities and Exchange Commission.


Download PDF

Copyright © 2025 Escano CPAs - All Rights Reserved.


Powered by

This website uses cookies.

We use cookies to analyze website traffic and optimize your website experience. By accepting our use of cookies, your data will be aggregated with all other user data.

Accept